Abstract
Transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) proteins form nonselective cation channels that play physiological roles in a wide variety of cells. Despite growing evidence supporting the therapeutic potential of TRPC6 inhibition in treating pathological cardiac and renal conditions, mechanistic understanding of TRPC6 function and modulation remains obscure. Here we report cryo-EM structures of TRPC6 in both antagonist-bound and agonist-bound states. The structures reveal two novel recognition sites for the small-molecule modulators corroborated by mutagenesis data. The antagonist binds to a cytoplasm-facing pocket formed by S1-S4 and the TRP helix, whereas the agonist wedges at the subunit interface between S6 and the pore helix. Conformational changes upon ligand binding illuminate a mechanistic rationale for understanding TRPC6 modulation. Furthermore, structural and mutagenesis analyses suggest several disease-related mutations enhance channel activity by disrupting interfacial interactions. Our results provide principles of drug action that may facilitate future design of small molecules to ameliorate TRPC6-mediated diseases.
🔬 Techniques
🧪 Sample Preparation
🔬 Cell Lines
🏭 Microscope Brands
🧪 Reagent Suppliers
💻 Software Details
💾 Data Repositories
🏛️ Research Organizations (ROR)
Affiliated research institutions:
📋 Methods
TRPC6 cloning and expression An N-terminally truncated human TRPC6 (residue 73–931) and its variant V867T/L868T were each cloned into a pORBMam vector with an N-terminal Strep tag. The recombinant baculoviruses were generated in Sf9 cells following a conventional protocol. P2 virus was used to infect HEK293 cells lacking N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (GnTI − ) at 3.5 × 10 6 cells/ml. After 12 hr of culture at 37°C, 10 mM Sodium butyrate was added to the suspension and the temperature was lowered to 30°C. Cells were harvested 48 hr post infection. TRPC6 purification and nanodisc reconstitution All purification steps were done at 4°C and in the presence of 1 μM antagonist or agonist. The cell pellet was resuspended in buffer A (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 8.0) supplemented with 0.5% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail. Cells were disrupted in an Microfluidizer and membrane fractions were isolated with two-step centrifugations. Membranes were first homogenized in buffer A and then solubilized with 1% (w/v) lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol (LMNG) and 0.1% (w/v) cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) at 4°C for 2 hr. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 40,000 g for 1 hr and the supernatant was mixed with Strep Tactin resin at 4°C for overnight. The resin was collected on a gravity column, washed with buffer A plus 0.06% (w/v) digitonin. The bound protein was eluted with 5 mM Desthiobiotin, concentrated and further purified by size exclusion chromatography using a Superose 6 Increase column equilibrated in buffer A plus 0.06% digitonin and 2 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). For nanodisc reconstitution, peak fractions were collected, concentrated to 1 mg/ml, and mixed with MSP2N2 and soybean lipid extract at a molar ratio of 1:3:225 for 1 hr. To remove detergents, two batches of fresh Bio-Beads SM2 were added at a concentration of 20 mg/ml with 4 hr in between. After overnight incubation, the sample was filtered and loaded onto a Superose 6 Increase column equilibrated in buffer A plus 2 mM TCEP. Peak fractions were pooled and concentrated to 1.5 mg/ml in the presence of 30 μM antagonist or agonist.
Show full methods section
TRPC6 cloning and expression An N-terminally truncated human TRPC6 (residue 73–931) and its variant V867T/L868T were each cloned into a pORBMam vector with an N-terminal Strep tag. The recombinant baculoviruses were generated in Sf9 cells following a conventional protocol. P2 virus was used to infect HEK293 cells lacking N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (GnTI − ) at 3.5 × 10 6 cells/ml. After 12 hr of culture at 37°C, 10 mM Sodium butyrate was added to the suspension and the temperature was lowered to 30°C. Cells were harvested 48 hr post infection. TRPC6 purification and nanodisc reconstitution All purification steps were done at 4°C and in the presence of 1 μM antagonist or agonist. The cell pellet was resuspended in buffer A (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 8.0) supplemented with 0.5% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail. Cells were disrupted in an Microfluidizer and membrane fractions were isolated with two-step centrifugations. Membranes were first homogenized in buffer A and then solubilized with 1% (w/v) lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol (LMNG) and 0.1% (w/v) cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) at 4°C for 2 hr. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 40,000 g for 1 hr and the supernatant was mixed with Strep Tactin resin at 4°C for overnight. The resin was collected on a gravity column, washed with buffer A plus 0.06% (w/v) digitonin. The bound protein was eluted with 5 mM Desthiobiotin, concentrated and further purified by size exclusion chromatography using a Superose 6 Increase column equilibrated in buffer A plus 0.06% digitonin and 2 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). For nanodisc reconstitution, peak fractions were collected, concentrated to 1 mg/ml, and mixed with MSP2N2 and soybean lipid extract at a molar ratio of 1:3:225 for 1 hr. To remove detergents, two batches of fresh Bio-Beads SM2 were added at a concentration of 20 mg/ml with 4 hr in between. After overnight incubation, the sample was filtered and loaded onto a Superose 6 Increase column equilibrated in buffer A plus 2 mM TCEP. Peak fractions were pooled and concentrated to 1.5 mg/ml in the presence of 30 μM antagonist or agonist.
Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection
Grid preparation was performed at 100% humidity and 10°C using a Mark IV Vitrobot (FEI). 3.5 μl of TRPC6 in nanodiscs was applied onto a glow-discharged Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300-mesh copper holey carbon grid. Grids were blotted for 6 s at a force setting of 1 before being plunged into liquid ethane. Images were recorded on a 300 kV Titan Krios (FEI) microscope with a K2 summit detector (Gatan). Serial EM ( Mastronarde and Held, 2017 ) was used for automated image acquisition with a binned pixel size of 0.832 Å. For the antagonist-bound TRPC6 dataset, 10,009 movies were collected, and each movie was dose-fractionated to 30 frames with a total exposure time of 6 s and a total dose of ~50 electrons/Å ( Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007 ). For the agonist-bound TRPC6 dataset, 9517 movies were collected, and each movie was dose-fractionated to 31 frames with a total exposure time of 6.2 s and a total dose of ~50 electrons/Å ( Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007 ).
Cryo-EM data processing
Beam-induced motion was corrected in MotionCor2 ( Zheng et al., 2017 ). Contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters were estimated non-doseweighted micrographs on using CTFFIND4 ( Rohou and Grigorieff, 2015 ). All other data processing steps were performed using Relion-3 ( Zivanov et al., 2018 ). Initially, 20,000 particles were autopicked using Laplacian-of-Gaussian method. After 2D classification, 8 class averages were selected for reference-based autopicking on the full dataset. The extracted particles were binned to a pixel size of 4.16 Å and subjected to two rounds of 2D classification. For the antagonist-bound TRPC6 dataset, 547,081 good particles were sorted out and used for subsequent 3D classification and refinement. The initial reference map was generated ab initio and lowpass filtered to 40 Å. One good 3D class out of three, containing 90,014 particles, were re-extracted to a pixel size of 1.248 Å. 3D refinement with C4 symmetry yielded a 3.26 Å map. After CTF-refinement and Bayesian-polishing, the final resolution was improved to 3.08 Å. For the agonist-bound TRPC6 dataset, 341,431 particles belonging to good 2D class averages were selected. 3D classification further sorted out 68,553 particles. After CTF-refinement and Bayesian-polishing, the final 3D refinement yielded a 2.84 Å map. Model building The antagonist-bound TRPC6 model was built in Coot ( Emsley et al., 2010 ) using the TRPC6 cryo-EM structure ( Tang et al., 2018 ) (PDB 5Y × 9) as a guide. The model was subjected to real space refinement against sharpened map in Phenix ( Afonine et al., 2012 ) with secondary structure restraints. The refined model of antagonist-bound TRPC6 was used as a reference to build the agonist-bound TRPC6 model. Local resolution was estimated using ResMap ( Kucukelbir et al., 2014 ). Validation of geometries was performed in MolProbity ( Chen et al., 2010 ). All the structure figures were generated in Chimera ( Pettersen et al., 2004 ), Pymol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System) and HOLE ( Smart et al., 1996 ). FLIPR assay TRPC6 Ca 2+ channel activity was measured using a FLIPR (fluorescence imaging plate reader) Tetra system from Molecular Devices and the BD PBX Calcium Assay Kit (Becton Dickinson #640177). HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM high glucose +10% FBS + 1X NEAA (Invitrogen #11965) and were transiently transfected with TPRC6 WT or variant expression plasmids. Site directed mutagenesis to create TRPC6 variants was carried out by Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ) and variants were verified by DNA sequencing. Expression plasmids were prepared for transfection using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) and added to cells. 15,000 cells/well were plated in a 384-well black poly-D-lysine coated plate (Corning #356663). 24 hr post transfection, cells were loaded with calcium sensitive fluorescent dye utilizing the BD PBX Calcium Assay kit following the manufacturer’s protocol and incubated for 2 hr in the dark at room temperature. Compound plates were prepared in assay buffer containing 10 mM HEPES pH = 7.2 @25°C, 4 mM MgCl 2 , 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.1% BSA, 2 mM CaCl 2 . Compound addition to cells was automated on the FLIPR Tetra and fluorescent imaging was captured following the manufacturer’s protocol (Molecular Devices). Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 software.
Additional files Transparent reporting form
📊 Figures
Figure 1.
Overall architecture of the antagonist-bound TRPC6.
( a, b ) Cryo-EM map of the antagonist-bound TRPC6 viewed from parallel of the membrane ( a ) and the extracellular surface ( b ). The unsharpened reconstruction was shown in transparent gray. Lipids ...
Figure 1u2014figure supplement 1.
Functional characterization of wild-type and (u03942u201372) TRPC6.
( a, b ) Dose-response curves for TRPC6 activation by OAG ( a ) and agonist AM-0883 ( b ). ( c, d ) Dose-response curves for TRPC6 inhibition by antagonist AM-1473 in the presence of OAG ( c ) and ago...
Figure 1u2014figure supplement 2.
Cryo-EM analysis of antagonist-bound TRPC6.
( a ) Representative micrograph for TRPC6 in complex with antagonist reconstituted in nanodiscs. ( b ) Selected 2D class averages showing well-defined secondary-structural features and different orien...
Figure 1u2014figure supplement 3.
Representative densities for the antagonist-bound TRPC6 reconstruction.
Figure 2.
Binding of antagonist to TRPC6.
( a ) Chemical structure of the antagonist AM-1473. ( b ) Stick model of the antagonist model together with EM density depicted in blue mesh. ( c ) Close-up view of the antagonist-binding site. Residu...
Figure 2u2014figure supplement 1.
Density around the antagonist-binding site in the antagonist-bound TRPC6, agonist-bound TRPC6, BTDM-bound TRPC6 (PDB 5YX9), and TRPC3 (PDB 5ZBG) reconstructions.
Figure 2u2014figure supplement 2.
Dose-response curves for inhibition of TRPC6, TRPC6-R758K, TRPC3, and TRPC3-K689R by antagonist AM-1473 in the presence of OAG.
Figure 2u2014figure supplement 3.
Comparison of the modulation site located in the cytoplasm-facing pocket formed by S1-S4.
( a, b ) Binding site of the antagonist AM-1473 in TRPC6 viewed parallel to the membrane ( a ) and from the intracellular side ( b ). ( c, d ) Binding site of the antagonist 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl bora...
Figure 2u2014figure supplement 4.
Comparison of the lipid-binding site at the inner leaflet.
( a ) Side view of TMD of one subunit and S5-S6 of the adjacent subunit in the antagonist-bound state of TRPC6. Density for two lipid molecules is shown in green meshes. Models for the lipids are show...
Figure 3.
Location of FSGS-related mutations.
( a ) Overall structure with one subunit shown in blue and other three subunits in light blue. Residues whose mutations cause FSGS are shown as spheres on one subunit. ( b ) Close-up view of disease-r...
Figure 3u2014figure supplement 1.
Surface expression level of TRPC6 wild type and mutants.
( a ) Surface expression level of TRPC6 wild type and disease-related mutants. ( b ) Surface expression level of TRPC6 wild type and TRPC6 with single or double mutations at positions 867 and 868. ( c...
Figure 4.
Overall architecture of the agonist-bound TRPC6.
( a ) Cryo-EM map of the agonist-bound TRPC6 viewed from parallel of the membrane. The unsharpened reconstruction was shown in transparent gray. Lipids are colored in orange, and agonists in magenta. ...
Figure 4u2014figure supplement 1.
Cryo-EM analysis of agonist-bound TRPC6.
( a )u00a0Representative micrograph for TRPC6 in complex with agonist reconstituted in nanodiscs.u00a0( b )u00a0Selected 2D class averages showing well-defined secondary-structural features and differ...
Figure 4u2014figure supplement 2.
Representative densities for the agonist-bound TRPC6 reconstruction.
Figure 5.
Binding of agonist to TRPC6.
( a ) Chemical structure of the agonist AM-0883. AM-0883 was synthesized as a racemate and then separated into enantiomers with arbitrarily assigned stereochemistry.u00a0The two enantiomers showed a 5...
Figure 5u2014figure supplement 1.
Density around the agonist-binding site in the agonist-bound TRPC6, antagonist-bound TRPC6, BTDM-bound TRPC6 (PDB 5YX9), and TRPC3 (PDB 5ZBG) reconstructions.
Figure 5u2014figure supplement 2.
Sequence alignment of humanu00a0TRPCs for the two helices that contribute to the binding-site of agonist.
Residues that appear to interact with the agonist in TRPC6 and conserved in other TRPC variants are highlighted in yellow. Residue numbers for TRPC6 are marked.
Figure 5u2014figure supplement 3.
Comparison of the modulation site located at the subunit interface in the TMD.
( a ) Binding site of the agonist AM-0883 in TRPC6 viewed parallel to the membrane. ( b ) Binding site of the antagonist in Ca v Ab shown in the same orientation as a . ( c ) Binding site of the agoni...
Figure 6.
Ion channel pore.
( a, b ) Pore domain (S5-S6) of antagonist-bound ( a ) and agonist-bound ( b ) TRPC6 with front and rear subunits removed for clarity. Residues that form the selectivity filter and the intracellular g...
Figure 7.
Conformational changes upon ligand binding.
( a, b ) Structural superposition of the transmembrane domain of antagonist-bound and agonist-bound TRPC6 viewed from parallel of the membrane ( a ) and intracellular side ( b ). ( c-e ) Structure of ...
Figure 7u2014figure supplement 1.
Superposition of the intracellular domain between TRPC6-AM-1473 and TRPC6-AM-0883 ( a ), TRPC6-BTDM ( b , PDB 5YX9) and TRPC3 ( c , PDB 5ZBG).
Figure 7u2014figure supplement 2.
Structural comparison around the antagonist- and agonist- binding sites.
( a, b ) Close-up views of the antagonist-binding site ( a ) and the agonist-binding site ( b ). Structures in ( a ) are aligned with S1-S4, whereas structures in ( b ) are aligned with the pore helix...
Video 1.
Ligand-induced conformational changes.
The video shows a morph of the TMD of TRPC6 from the antagonist-bound state to the agonist-bound state. S1-S4 and the TRP helix are colored in light blue, whereas S5-S6 are colored in light cyan. The ...
Figure images are served from the NIH/NLM PubMed Central Open Access Subset or Europe PMC; copyright remains with the publishers and authors.
💬 Discussion
0 commentsNo comments yet. Be the first to start a discussion!
Leave a Comment